The Frailty of the Strong Executive

  • Peter D. Ore University of Arizona
  • Andrew Paul Davis North Carolina State University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32855/fcapital.202001.005
Keywords: Bureaucracy, Democratic Theory, Neoliberalism

Abstract

This essay reflects on the contemporaneous empowerment of the executive branch under the Trump administration with regard to other branches of government, as well as the disempowerment of the nation's bureacracy. We argue that this combination leads to a simultaneously unfettered, yet feeble executive that has little oversight, yet is routinely ineffective. We explore how tensions in organizational and political theory with regard to private and public governance have presaged this administrative move. This essay concludes by discussing why elite actors might support such an unencumbered, yet ineffective executive.

Author Biographies

Peter D. Ore, University of Arizona

Peter Ore is a Ph.D. candidate in Sociology at the University of Arizona, and a Graduate Fellow in the Andrew W. Mellon Sawyer Seminar on "Neoliberalism at the Neopopulist Crossroads." He studies infrastructural development and data production in capitalist democracies, the history of the population sciences, and the political economy of air pollution exposure. His dissertation is on state surveillance of industry from the Cold War to the present. 

Andrew Paul Davis, North Carolina State University

Andrew Davis is an assistant professor of sociology at North Carolina State University. His ongoing research interests are in political sociology, the sociology of human rights, social theory, global conflict, and quantitative methods. His most recent work applies formal organizational and network theory to understand widespread human rights violations in the global system. His research has been published in a variety of peer-reviewed outlets including Social Science Research, Poetics, the International Journal of Comparative Sociology, Punishment & Society, Comparative Sociology, Sociological Perspectives, and The Sociological Quarterly.

References

Baran, Paul and Paul M. Sweezy. 1966. Monopoly Capital. New York: Modern Reader.

Blau, Peter M. 1956. Bureaucracy in Modern Society. New York; Random House.

Block, Fred, and Margaret R. Somers. 2014. The power of market fundamentalism. Harvard University Press.

Bozeman, Barry, Pamela N. Reed, and Patrick Scott. 1992. “Red Tape and Task Delays in Public and Private Organizations.†Administration and Society 24 (3): 290-322.

Brenner, R. 2003. The boom and the bubble: The US in the world economy. Verso.

Chandler, Alfred D. 1977. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Harvard University Press.

Constas, Helen. 1958. “Max Weber’s Two Conceptions of Bureaucracy.†American Journal of Sociology 63 (4): 400-409.

Domhoff, G. William. 1967. Who Rules America? Prentice Hall; 1st ed.

Evans, P. (1997). The eclipse of the state? Reflections on stateness in an era of globalization. World politics, 50(1), 62-87.

Fountain, Jane E. 2016. Building an Enterprise Government: Creating an Ecosystem for Cross-Agency Collaboration in the Next Administration. Partnership for Public Service white paper.

Gouldner, A. 1952. “Red tape as a social problem.†In Robert Merton, A. Gray, B. Hockey, & H. Selvin (Eds.), Reader in bureaucracy.

Glencoe, IL: The Free press.

Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Hamilton, Alexander, or James Madison. Federalist No. 51: "The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments." New York Packet, February 8, 1788.

Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

Hull, Matthew S. "Documents and bureaucracy." Annual review of anthropology 41 (2012): 251-267.

Katznelson, Ira. When affirmative action was white: An untold history of racial inequality in twentieth-century America. WW Norton & Company, 2005.

Kaufman, H. 1977. Red tape: Its origins, uses and abuses. Washington, DC: Brookings Institutions.

Marx, Karl. [1843] 1970. Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Cambridge University Press.

Merton, Robert. 1940. “Bureaucratic structure and personality.†Social Forces, 18: 560-568.

Meyer, Marshall W. 1979. Change in public bureaucracies. Cambridge University Press.

Mills, C. Wright. 1956. The Power Elite.

Naylor, Brian. 2019. “An Acting Government for the Trump Administration.†National Public Radio: https://www.npr.org/2019/04/09/711094554/an-acting-government-for-the-trump-administration

Newport, Frank. 2018. “What Americans Want Their Government to Do Now.†Gallup Polling Matters: https://news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/244154/americans-government.aspx

Osnos, Evan. 2018. “Trump VS. the ‘Deep State’†The New Yorker: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/05/21/trump-vs-the-deep-state

Pérez-Liñán, Anibal, Nicolás Schmidt & Daniela Vairo (2019) Presidential hegemony and democratic backsliding in Latin America, 1925–2016, Democratization, 26:4, 606-625.

Quadagno, Jill S. 1994. The color of welfare: How racism undermined the war on poverty. Oxford University Press.

Riley, Dylan John. 1997. “American Brumaire?†New Left Review. 103: 21-32.

Scaff, Lawrence A. 2015. "Max Weber's Legacy." The Annual Review of Sociology, no. 28: 18-27.

Scott, James C. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press, 1998.

Swedberg, Richard. "The changing picture of Max Weber's sociology." Annual Review of Sociology 29, no. 1 (2003): 283-306.

Tenpas, Kathryn Dunn. 2019. Brookings: https://www.brookings.edu/research/tracking-turnover-in-the-trump-administration/ accessed 12/31/2019.

Tilly, Charles. 1985. “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime.†In Eds. Peter Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda

Skocpol. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge†Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, V. 1961. Modern organization. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Weber, Max. 1968. On Charisma and Institution Building: Selected Papers, Edited and with an Introduction by S.N. Eisenstadt. University of Chicago Press. Chicago and London.

Published
2020-06-19
Issue
Vol. 17 No. 1: This Is Not Normal
Section
This Is Not Normal

Copyright (c) 2020 Peter D. Ore, Andrew Paul Davis

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors of papers published in Fast Capitalism hold copyright to their work. Requests for permission to reprint should be directed to the author.

Creative Commons License
Fast Capitalism is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.