Learning Management Systems as Anti-Convivial Tools

Edward Maclin

Abstract


The last two decades have seen an increase in the number of online university classes operating under any of several commercial Learning Management Systems (LMS). Online classes expanded dramatically in the US during 2020 as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Students, faculty, and administrators frequently assume that LMSs are epistemologically neutral. These LMSs are designed to do exactly what they say on the tin: they are systems for managing learning. At the same time, they function based on implicit understandings of “learning,” “management,” and “systems” that privilege some knowledges, interactions, and discourses while de-emphasizing others. In this paper I argue that the LMS as a tool is not—in the terms of Ivan Illich—convivial. Rather, LMSs as designed enforce a technocratic perspective based on efficiency and replicability, making them actively anti-convivial. At the same time, problems with LMS-hosted classes are defined in technological terms, with additional improved software being seen as the main solution. I argue that employing a critical participatory pedagogy can begin to address these concerns.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aadne, John H., Georg von Krogh, and Johan Roos. 1996. “Representationism: The Traditional Approach to Cooperative Strategies.” Pp. 9–31 in Managing knowledge: Perspectives on cooperation and competition, edited by G. von Krogh and J. Roos. London: Sage.

Andriessen, Daniel G. 2006. “On the Metaphorical Nature of Intellectual Capital: A Textual Analysis.” Journal of Intellectual Capital 7(1):93–109.

Brown, John Seely, and Paul Duguid. 2001. “Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective.” Organization Science 12(2):198–213.

Brown, Malcolm, Joanne Dehoney, and Nancy Millichap. 2015. The Next Generation Digital Learning Environment: A Report on Research. UDUCAUSE Learning Initiative.

Ciolacu, Monica, Ali Fallah Tehrani, Rick Beer, and Heribert Popp. 2017. “Education 4.0 — Fostering Student’s Performance with Machine Learning Methods.” Pp. 438–43 in 2017 IEEE 23rd International Symposium for Design and Technology in Electronic Packaging (SIITME).

Cope, Bill, and Mary Kalantzis. 2021. “A Little History of E-Learning.”

Desantis, Nick. 2012. “Self-Described ‘EduPunk’ Says Colleges Should Abandon Course-Management Systems.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved March 10, 2022 (https://www.chronicle.com/article/self-described-edupunk-says-colleges-should-abandon-course-management-systems/).

Dowd, John. 2016. Educational Ecologies: Toward a Symbolic-Material Understanding of Discourse, Technology, and Education. Lexington Books.

Drijvers, Paul. 2019. “Embodied Instrumentation: Combining Different Views on Using Digital Technology in Mathematics Education.” P. 22 in. Utrecht University.

Dyrud, Marilyn. 2017. “Ethics and Artifacts.” P. 28298 in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. Columbus, Ohio: ASEE Conferences.

Freire, Paulo. 2005. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Gallagher, Sean, and Jason Palmer. 2020. “The Pandemic Pushed Universities Online. The Change Was Long Overdue.” Harvard Business Review.

Gibbs, Laura. 2017. “More Visible Learning, NOT More Visible Grades #TTOG – Teaching with Canvas.” Retrieved March 30, 2022 (http://canvas.lauragibbs.net/wpblog/grading/more-visible-learning-not-more-visible-grades-ttog/).

Green, Kathryn R., and Haynes L. Chewning. 2020. “The Fault in Our Systems: LMS as a Vehicle for Critical Pedagogy.” TechTrends 64(3):423–31. doi: 10.1007/s11528-020-00480-w.

Hall, Richard. 2019. “On Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Poetic Epistemology.” Social Epistemology 33(4):298–308. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2019.1638985.

Harnad, Stevan. 2003. “Minds, Machines and Turing.” Pp. 253–73 in The Turing Test: The Elusive Standard of Artificial Intelligence, Studies in Cognitive Systems, edited by J. H. Moor. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Hill, Phil. 2015. “LMS Is The Minivan of Education (and Other Thoughts from #LILI15).” E-Literate. Retrieved March 15, 2022 (https://eliterate.us/lms-is-the-minivan-of-education-and-other-thoughts-from-lili15/).

Illich, Ivan. 1973. Tools for Conviviality. New York: Harper & Row.

Kakihara, Masao, and Carsten Sørensen. 2002. “Exploring Knowledge Emergence: From Chaos to Organizational Knowledge.” Journal of Global Information Technology Management 5(3):48–66.

Kipnis, Andrew B. 2008. “Audit Cultures: Neoliberal Governmentality, Socialist Legacy, or Technologies of Governing?” American Ethnologist 35(2):275–89. doi: 10/b5fkds.

Latour, Bruno. 1987a. “Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer.” Social Problems 35(3):298–310.

Latour, Bruno. 1987b. “Visualisation and Social Reproduction: Opening One Eye While Closing the Other … A Note on Some Religious Paintings.” The Sociological Review 35(1):15–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1987.tb00081.x.

Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Luan, Hui, and Chin-Chung Tsai. 2022. “A Review of Using Machine Learning Approaches for Precision Education.” 18.

Millar, Jason. 2015. “Technology as Moral Proxy: Autonomy and Paternalism by Design.” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 34(2):47–55. doi: 10.1109/MTS.2015.2425612.

Morozov, Evgeny. 2013. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: PublicAffairs.

Morris, Sean Michael. 2017a. “Critical Digital Pedagogy and Design.” Sean Michael Morris. Retrieved March 15, 2022 (https://www.seanmichaelmorris.com/critical-digital-pedagogy-and-design/).

Morris, Sean Michael. 2017b. “If Bell Hooks Made an LMS: A Praxis of Liberation and Domain of One’s Own.” Sean Michael Morris. Retrieved March 11, 2022 (https://www.seanmichaelmorris.com/if-bell-hooks-made-an-lms/).

Mott, Jon, and David Wiley. 2009. “Open for Learning: The CMS and the Open Learning Network.” BYU Faculty Publications 15(2):22. doi: 10.37119/ojs2009.v15i2.53.

Nastasi, Bonnie K., Kristen Varjas, Stephen L. Schensul, K. Tudor Silva, Jean J. Schensul, and Priyani Ratnayake. 2000. “The Participatory Intervention Model: A Framework for Conceptualizing and Promoting Intervention Acceptability.” School Psychology Quarterly 15(2):207–32. doi: 10.1037/h0088785.

NCES. 2021. “NCES Blog | Distance Education in College: What Do We Know From IPEDS?” Retrieved October 7, 2021 (https://nces.ed.gov/blogs/nces/post/distance-education-in-college-what-do-we-know-from-ipeds).

Nonaka, Ikujiro, and Hirotaka Takeuchi. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How the Japanese Companies Create the Dynamic of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Paulsen, Morten, and Torstein Rekkedal. 2001. “The NKI Internet College: A Review of 15 Years Delivery of 10,000 Online Courses.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 1(2). doi: 10/gm26c8.

Ramos, Gonzalo, Christopher Meek, Patrice Simard, Jina Suh, and Soroush Ghorashi. 2020. “Interactive Machine Teaching: A Human-Centered Approach to Building Machine-Learned Models.” Human–Computer Interaction 35(5–6):413–51. doi: 10.1080/07370024.2020.1734931.

Schensul, Jean J., Marlene J. Berg, and Ken M. Williamson. 2008. “Challenging Hegemonies: Advancing Collaboration in Community-Based Participatory Action Research.” Collaborative Anthropologies 1(1):102–37. doi: 10.1353/cla.0.0009.

Scott, James C. 1998. “Introduction.” Pp. 464–464 in Seeing Like a State. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Shore, Cris, and Susan Wright. 2015. “Governing by Numbers: Audit Culture, Rankings and the New World Order.” Social Anthropology 23(1):22–28. doi: 10/gn4mq3.

Simard, Patrice Y., Saleema Amershi, David M. Chickering, Alicia Edelman Pelton, Soroush Ghorashi, Christopher Meek, Gonzalo Ramos, Jina Suh, Johan Verwey, Mo Wang, and John Wernsing. 2017. “Machine Teaching: A New Paradigm for Building Machine Learning Systems.” ArXiv:1707.06742 [Cs, Stat].

Skinner, Burrhus Frederic. 1958. “Teaching Machines.” Science 128(3330):969–77.

Stommel, Jesse. 2017. “If Bell Hooks Made an LMS: Grades, Radical Openness, and Domain of One’s Own.” Jesse Stommel. Retrieved March 11, 2022 (https://www.jessestommel.com/if-bell-hooks-made-an-lms-grades-radical-openness-and-domain-of-ones-own/).

Strathern, Marilyn, ed. 2000. Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy. London New York: Routledge.

Turing, A. M. 1950. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind LIX(236):433–60. doi: 10/b262dj.

Zhu, Xiaojin, Adish Singla, Sandra Zilles, and Anna N. Rafferty. 2018. “An Overview of Machine Teaching.” ArXiv:1801.05927 [Cs].




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32855/fcapital.202201.010

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 Edward Maclin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 1930-014X