The Pandemic Preferred User

Katie Ellis, Kai-Ti Kao, Tim Pitman

Abstract


As COVID-19 was declared a pandemic, universities acted quickly to move their core business of teaching and research online. Classes shifted to platforms such as Zoom, Webex, Collaborate and Microsoft Teams and teachers and students alike were expected to adapt. And they did. While there has been much discussion of the unpaid labour involved in making this shift and the difficulties inherent in merging work, study and domestic life, there has been little acknowledgement or analysis of inherent notions of the preferred user in this rapid shift to technology.

This paper draws on critical disability studies to offer a conceptual and theoretical analysis of a deeply problematic aspect of the rapid move to online education in response to COVID-19: the reliance of notions of the preferred user. The preferred user is simply the type of person technology creators or institutions envision using their product or service. Within critical disability studies the preferred user is often recognised as white, male and able bodied (see Ellcessor, 2017). In other words, the preferred user often excludes people with disability and other forms of disadvantage.

Accordingly, in this paper we offer a preliminary overview, conceptualisation, and reflection on students with disability (and by extension other non-preferred users), their experiences and perspectives in relation to what might be described as disabling approaches to online learning, for example synchronous learning, video conferencing.

Firstly, we introduce the concept of disability, as it has been redefined in the past two decades, as social, political, cultural, and rights-based – rather than some kind of biomedical condition or charity topic.  We also give an overview of universal design for learning to reflect on the importance of adapting learning environments for all students.

Secondly, we discuss the disconnect between students, teachers and support staff. From these cases, there are some significant challenges to key questions, such as how we understand students with disability, whose responsibility is it to provide access and support, and is mainstreaming accessible technology always the most appropriate answer?

Thirdly, we chart the ways these already existing issues have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic and the opportunities that have also arisen. For example, accessibility features such as captioning for people with disabilities, or non-preferred users, are actually beneficial to everyone.

Finally, while the forced shift to online learning during this pandemic has the ideal potential to accommodate “non-preferred” users, the actual roll out and delivery of online learning is still defaulting to modes that are both difficult and challenging, and in many cases exacerbates existing issues and inequalities. We conclude with suggestions about how a consideration of the non-preferred user might actually be the preferred approach for all.

 

 


Keywords


accessibility; COVID-19, preferred user; captions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adefila, A., Broughan, C., Phimister, D., & Opie, J. (2020). Developing an autonomous-support culture in Higher Education for disabled students. Disability and health journal, 100890-100890. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100890

Alper, M. (2017). Giving voice : mobile communication, disability, and inequality: Cambridge, Massachusetts :MIT Press.

Anderson, G. (2020, 6 April). Accessibility Suffers During Pandemic. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/04/06/remote-learning-shift-leaves-students-disabilities-behind

Australian Disability Clearinghouse on Education and Training. (2019). Higher Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.adcet.edu.au/inclusive-teaching/understanding-disability/Higher-Education-Statistics/

Barnes, C. (1992). Disabling imagery and the media: An exploration of the principles for media representations of disabled people. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/Barnes/disabling%20

imagery.pdf

Bialka, C. (2018). College Students with Disabilities Are Too Often Excluded. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/college-students-with-disabilities-are-too-often-excluded-105027

Brink, C. (2009). “Standards Will Drop”--and Other Fears about the Equality Agenda in Higher Education. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(1), 11. doi:10.1787/hemp-v21-art2-en

De Cesarei, A., & Baldaro, B. (2015). Doing online research involving university students with disabilities: Methodological issues. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 374-380. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.028

Department of Employment Education and Training. (1990). A fair chance for all. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.

Easterbrook, A., Bulk, L. Y., Jarus, T., Hahn, B., Ghanouni, P., Lee, M., . . . Parhar, G. (2019). University gatekeepers’ use of the rhetoric of citizenship to relegate the status of students with disabilities in Canada. Disability & Society, 34(1), 1-23. doi:10.1080/09687599.2018.1505603

Ellcessor, E. (2016). Restricted access : media, disability, and the politics of participation: New York : New York University Press.

Ellis, K., & Kent, M. (2011). Disability and New Media. New York: Routledge.

Farley, R. (2017, 29 July). Get Over Your Fear Of Subtitles, Please. Retrieved from https://www.refinery29.com/tv-closed-captions-movie-subtitles-benefits

Fichten, C. S., Nguyen, M. N., King, L., Barile, M., Havel, A., Mimouni, Z., . . . Asuncion, J. (2013). Information and Communication Technology Profiles of College Students with Learning Disabilities and Adequate and Very Poor Readers. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1), 176. doi:10.5539/jel.v2n1p176

Finkelstein, V. (1975). To Deny or Not to Deny Disability. Magic Carpet, 27(1), 31-38. Retrieved from http://www.independentliving.org/docs1/finkelstein.html

Fleming, A. R., Oertle, K. M., & Plotner, A. J. (2017). Student Voices: Recommendations for Improving Postsecondary Experiences of Students with Disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 30(4), 309.

Fleming , A. R., Plotner, A. J., & Oertle, K. M. (2017). College Students with Disabilities: The Relationship between Student Characteristics, the Academic Environment, and Performance. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 30(3), 209.

Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2003). Digital Disability: The social construction of Disability in New Media. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.

Kao, K.-T., Tay, E., & Woods, D. (2020). Accessibility and Inclusivity: Collaborative Learning and Students with Disabilities. Paper presented at the WA Teaching and Learning Forum, Joondalup Westen Australia.

Kehe, J. (2018, 26 June). The real resason you use closed captions for everything now. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/closed-captions-everywhere/?mbid=social_fb

Kent, M. (2015). Disability and eLearning: Opportunities and Barriers. Disability Studies Quarterly, 35(1), http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3815/3830.

Kent, M. (2016). Access and barriers to online education for people with disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.ncsehe.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Access-and-Barriers-to-Online-Education-for-People-with-Disabilities.pdf

Langørgen, E., & Magnus, E. (2018). ‘We are just ordinary people working hard to reach our goals!’ Disabled students’ participation in Norwegian higher education. Disability & Society, 33(4), 598-617. doi:10.1080/096

2018.1436041

Madriaga, M., Hanson, K., Kay, H., & Walker, A. (2011). Marking-out normalcy and disability in higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(6), 901-920. doi:10.1080/01425692.2011.596380

McRae, L., Ellis, K., & Kent, M. (2018). Internet of Things (IoT): Education and Technology. The relationship between education and technology for students with disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.ncsehe.edu.au/

publications/internet-of-things-iot-education-and-technology-the-relationship-between-education-and-technology-for-students-with-disabilities/

Moriña, A., López-Gavira, R., & Molina, V. M. (2017). What if we could Imagine an Ideal University? Narratives by Students with Disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 64(4), 353-367. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2016.1228856

Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Houndsmill, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Pardy, B. (2017, 17 August). Bruce Pardy: Mental disabilities shouldn’t be accommodated with extra time on exams. Retrieved from http://nationalpost.com/opinion/bruce-pardy-mental-disabilities-shouldnt-be-accommodated-with-extra-time-on-exams

Raja, D. S. (2016). Bridging the disability divide through digital technologies: Background Paper for the 2016 World Development Report: Digital Dividends. Retrieved from http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/123481461249337484/WDR 16-BP-Bridging-the-Disability-Divide-through-Digital-Technology-RA JA.

pdf

Roberts, J. B., Crittenden, L. A., & Crittenden, J. C. (2011). Students with disabilities and online learning: A cross-institutional study of perceived satisfaction with accessibility compliance and services. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 242-250. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.004

United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html

Wong, B., & Chiu, Y.-L. T. (2019). Exploring the concept of ‘ideal’ university student. Studies in Higher Education, 1-12. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1643302




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32855/fcapital.202002.002

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2020 Katie Ellis, Kai-Ti Kao, Tim Pitman

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 1930-014X